Can't say I'm a big
fan of a certain strand of lefty acting like high school jocks 'giving wedgies
to the nerds' when it comes to some aspects of the natural sciences and science
communications.
Every now and then, I
read some smug, self-congratulatory posts (or more commonly the comments
beneath them) from often postmodern humanities-trained individuals describing
scientists as sexless nerds with no social skills. It’s dispiriting coming from
people who say they want a kinder, more egalitarian world. Relatedly, in recent
months, I've seen multiple articles in leftish publications jeering at
artificial intelligence research, the many
worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, the simulation argument, human
enhancement, synthetic biology, neuroscience, space
exploration, and even gifted (progressive) science popularisers like Neil
Degrasse Tyson and Bill Nye.
This comes atop the
already widespread irrational fears of many of these same people of 'teh
kemikalz', genetic engineering, nuclear energy, vaccination, and so-called
electro-pollution. The only areas within the natural sciences that seem to get
a free pass from some quarters of the left are climate science and conservation
biology. Perhaps this is because such people erroneously believe that the
findings of these researchers are endorsing their assertion that modern life is
rubbish.
There are convincing arguments as
to why artificial general intelligence or strong AI might be further away than
some people think. The many worlds interpretation is not
a consensus position in physics, and many argue it is unfalsifiable. There
are thoughtful
disagreements with the simulation argument. Even as the alleviation of
terrible suffering from some genetic disorders may soon be possible, ethical
quandaries abound. Security
is a legitimate concern with synthetic biology and how accessible it is
becoming. There is certainly some less-than-rigorous
neuroscience research that tends toward the deterministic and less than
replicable at best and outright quackery at worst. Private space exploration is
likely promising
much more than it can deliver. And science popularisers should probably
read a little more philosophy before they start suggesting
it is a waste
of time.
There are lots of very
interesting social, economic, ethical and political conversations to be had
about all these subjects, and many of those most familiar with them -- the
researchers themselves -- are indeed having these very conversations. But the
rhetorical equivalent of stuffing geeks into their lockers is not just
mean-spirited; the wilful ignorance on display is as embarrassing as boasting
that you can't read.
It’s also a sure-fire
way to push natural scientists into the arms of the libertarians.
I loved this one. It has given me courage to try scarier things. I tend to steer clear of them but not anymore.
ReplyDeletePackers And Movers Hyderabad
Packers And Movers jubileehills Hyderabad
Really impressive post. I read it whole and going to share it with my social circules. I enjoyed your article and planning to rewrite it on my own blog. @ Local Packers And Movers Bangalore
ReplyDeletePackers And Movers Hsr Layout Bangalore
Packers and Movers Whitefield Bangalore
Packers and Movers JP Nagar Bangalore
Packers And Movers Mohali
The information you are providing that is really good. Thank for making and spending your precious time for this useful information. Thanks again and keep it up. Read more: https://www.akgvg.com/
ReplyDeleteAccounting firms