What the debate between progressives over Brexit could have been like:
SCENE I. The front
room of The Picket and Placard, a cozy old pub
Enter LEAVER and
REMAINER, old friends who have been campaigning outside the local Tesco for
their respective sides. REMAINER buys the first round.
Leaver: Comrade,
it’s a simple question of democracy. The EU does not meet democratic norms, and
we should reject it just as we reject monarchy, the House of Lords and TTIP.
Remainer:
Comrade, I’ve looked into the EU’s structures and I must agree, there is indeed
a substantial democratic deficit. But we must stay in to reform the EU.
Leaver: But how,
comrade? What would be the mechanism by which it could be democratically reformed?
In the UK, if we do not like the government, we elect a new one. We cannot do
that in Europe.
Remainer: You
raise a good point, comrade. I will have to think some more about that. At the
same time, there has at least been some democratic advance over the years. The
Lisbon Treaty gave the European Parliament, the only elected EU institution, a
lot more power.
Leaver: True,
comrade, but unlike any other democratic parliament, it still has no right of
legislative initiative. That means it can’t make laws; it can only amend them.
The unelected commission is the source of all legislative proposals. And the galloping
expansion of structures of extra-democratic decision-making by bureaucrats and
judges since the Eurozone crisis more than outweighs any democratic gains in
the Lisbon Treaty anyway.
Remainer: Don’t
get me wrong, comrade; I am appalled at the sharp erosion in democracy over the
last few years both in the Eurozone and the wider EU. What has been imposed on
Greece is unforgivable. But we both want to see progressive change: higher
wages, stronger social protections, union rights, and an end to privatisation. Yet
in a globalized economy, social democracy in one country just isn’t possible
any more. Only much larger economies like the US and China seem to be able to
withstand the slings and arrows of capital flight. The EU may not respect the
democratic will of the people, but do you really think international markets
will be any more respectful? Internationalism isn’t some added extra; it’s one of
the only weapons we have left.
Leaver: You raise
a good point, comrade. I will have to think some more about that. But I also
don’t think we should just call for Brexit and leave it there. Workers across
Europe need to join together in a movement for European democracy. It will
require international coordination, including open-ended cross-border strike
action, like nothing we’ve seen before, more ambitious than the dozens of
one-day strikes in Greece, Italy and Spain, which, as militant as they were, were not enough to make EU
elites back down. I would be perfectly happy with a United States of Europe——but
it has to come from the will of the people, from such a movement, not imposed
from above.
Remainer: But,
comrade, that’s what I think is necessary too! And I think I have an answer to
your question about how to reform the EU. It cannot be done from within as
there is no mechanism for this, I agree. It has to be via pressure from the
outside: a true European democracy movement, making European elites so
frightened that they have no choice but to give us democracy. I think we
basically want the same thing.
Leaver: Yes.
Nonetheless——and it’s not an easy choice, comrade——I’m still going to vote Leave.
Remainer: I too
have struggled over this decision, comrade, but I’m still going to vote Remain.
Leaver &
Remainer: But after the referendum, let’s both continue to work together to
build that European democracy movement!
Our players hug, raise
their fists together in defiance, sing the Internationale, and exit (or remain) stage
left.
What the debate between progressives over Brexit has actually been like:
SCENE I. A Facebook
comment section
Enter LEAVER and
REMAINER, old friends who have just returned from a hard day’s outrage on the
Twitters.
Leaver: Comrade,
it’s a simple question of democracy. The EU does not meet democratic norms, and
we should reject it just as we reject monarchy, the House of Lords and TTIP.
Remainer:
Democracy schmemocracy, you racist shitlord!
Leaver: Comrade,
come on, I think we can have a sensible conversation here. We’ve been friends
for years.
Remainer: Boris!
Nigel!
Leaver: And your
side is backed by Cameron, Osborne, the CBI, and the IMF, and funded by Lord
Sainsbury, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Need I go on? The left
should not just automatically take whatever position is opposite to our
opponents, but rather formulate an independent position.
Remainer: What,
do you want Boris for prime minister?
Leaver: You’re
not making any sense. That’s not a logical response to what I just said.
Remainer: The EU
is an environmental wonderland, saving us from climate deniers.
Leaver: That also
does not follow on from our discussion. But okay, I’ll take your bait: What is
important is not whether the king is good or bad, but that he is a king. In any
case, the EU’s flagship climate policy, the Emissions Trading Scheme, is a
neoliberal boondoggle that has not resulted in carbon mitigation. Meanwhile the
EU deregulates and privatises the very public energy companies we need to build
out clean-energy infrastructure.
Remainer:
Whatever. People are xenophobic idiots. If we leave the EU, this will give
confidence to the far right and then two weeks later everyone will be a Nazi
and all the immigrants will be gassed. Only the EU can liberate us from the
mouth-breathing Sun readers.
Leaver: You
really don’t like working people very much, do you? In any case, isn’t it the
EU that is building Fortress Europe, letting migrants drown in the
Mediterranean while bribing autocratic Turkey to keep them out?
Remainer:
Brexiters are objectively siding with racism and xenophobia.
Leaver: Now
you’re just blurting out slogans, not even debating any more.
Remainer: There’s
no debating with racists and xenophobes. Their hate speech must be shut down.
Leaver: What?!
This is crackers. You’ve known me for years. We’ve been on how many
pro-immigration protests together? Was Tony Benn a racist and xenophobe?
Remainer: Bigot!
Fascist! Boris! Nigel! Boris! BORIS! BORRRISSSSS!
REMAINER defriends LEAVER,
later no-platforms them from speaking at a university public meeting, and then subsequently
sends them to the countryside for re-education via a series of unlearning-racism sensitivity workshops.
This was wonderful. Funny, accurate and a great piece of writing. I can honestly say that in the past few weeks I have played out both scenarios almost word for word. Well done!
ReplyDeleteAs ever there is much truth in humour.
ReplyDeleteAnd this is the most effective way to tell truth, sometimes ...
DeleteI believe humour has to be used at this time as emotions are high, particularly after the murder of a progressive British MP. This is an excellent piece of comedy. And already (not my view) it is going to seem a very brave act in producing a piece of writing like this. It is SO accurate. It portrays the zeitgeist of what is taking place NOW in conversations all over Britain. I saw myself and many (ex) friends throughout the years never mind throughout the last few weeks, days, hours, minutes. Of course this is PRECISELY the result the Ruling Class know they can foster and 'explode' in an already emotional and vulnerable populace living in recession after recession. It's so sad that, like the Scottish Independence Referendum of 2014, I have had to sever ties with friends and family who have become emotionally violent and threatening towards me. Thi is the experience of tens of thousands. Still, we must carry on with what is an ugly process.
ReplyDelete